Commented on sndaya's review
Sep 25, 2005 09:18 AM
'The lobbying has always for Ganguly'. Now that is something i would find hard to believe.How will you feel if your boss comes up to you and tells you that you are good for nothing in front of your peers? I hope nobody goes through that. And that great Greg Chappell was the only scared sucker in Cri...cket's history who made his brother bowl a underhand ball to deny NZ a fair shot to victory. Now with this mail controversy it is evident that he hates Ganguly's guts. Ganguly never needed any lobby for his existence. His own performance and great captaincy has supported his stay. And he is good enough to serve as captain for not less than 3-4 years. The lobby which is against Ganguly consists of Mumbaikar Gavaskar, Bishen, Dungarpur, Kirti Azad, Maninder Singh and many more. Many members of the BCCI except Dalmiya are against Ganguly.
Was it Ganguly's fault that his a**hole's mail was leaked. This guy is such a big manipulator. First he demoralizes a captain, then after he scores a century tells the Media that he wanted to motivate Ganguly and now this mail. Greg is really great , a great big White B*tch.
Hey ! Dont compare Ganguly with Dravid. Its like comparing a grown up man(Ganguly da) with a EUNUCH (Rahul).Read More
Reviewed Remix
Feb 26, 2005 11:50 PM
2801 Views
(Updated Feb 27, 2005 11:45 PM)
Remix is a good serial and is a breath of fresh air for people who are getting choked watching these saas bahu and family serials.
The serial revolves around four Characters: anvesha, yuvi, ranveer and tia.
Tia Ahuja who really is not that good looking but acts well as a spoilt young girl ...Read more
Commented on own review
Jun 22, 2004 10:31 PM
For your information, i have also played matches at college and club (zonal) level and know about cricket more than false claimers like urself. However, i had to leave my pursuit of cricket as my family wanted me to conc on studies. Even if you say that u played with Wadekar and Durrani, it does not... make u a cricket expert. I am hosting sites on cricket and writing articles on the great game even while working as a software developer. I love this game and know what is happening in the Indian team to a certain extent. Sehwag could never have become what he has if he did not have Ganguly's unconditional support and you know that too. Lets end the discussion here. Sehwaq is a great talent but he has to prove himself with consistent performance over a good number of years. OKRead More
Commented on own review
Jun 21, 2004 08:55 PM
What are you talking about Doctor?
I am politely asking you to stop commenting about things you know very little about. Ganguly is 10 times more effective sachin and rahul in ODI's. HE is a match winner and not like sachin who can fire only when India does not need him badly. Anyways i really canno...t understand what you have said as your sentence construction is poor, to say the least.Read More
Reviewed Virendra Sehwag
Jun 19, 2004 08:45 PM
4610 Views
(Updated Jun 19, 2004 09:19 PM)
One of the most dominating openers, cricket has ever produced, Sehwag has a tremendous hand eye coordination that hides his obvious lack of techinque. The bat speed he generates allows him to flick , drive and pull balls to boundaries with minimal effort.
Sehwag was recently heard in newspape...Read more
Commented on juggernaut's review
May 11, 2004 11:26 PM
Dukaaar or burping is the best thing God gave us. As they say ' WHY F*RT and WASTE WHEN YOU CAN BURP AND TASTE'
Commented on sriniforu's review
Apr 25, 2004 07:24 PM
But even Murali is not a match winner nowadays. Lets not forget that Murali has only prospered on slow dry wickets particularly in home conditions. The only great spell bowled by him was at Lords against England Even then the Aussies got the better of him. Vaas is the real unsung hero who has delive...red for SL when needed most. Srilanka has always struggled on away conditions and thats the reality.Read More
Commented on zeus_wins's review
Apr 25, 2004 05:12 PM
Hi,
A great review on the punter. He is really now one of the best batsmen in the world. And that fact that he is just 29 or 30 will instill fear on the very best bowlers of the opposition.
Commented on own review
Apr 25, 2004 05:07 PM
even being a diehard Indian cricket fan, i can feel for Zimbabwe as the only high quality players in the ZIM team are being left out because racism is showing its ugly face yet again.
Reviewed Sri Lanka Cricket Team
Apr 25, 2004 03:08 PM
3588 Views
(Updated Apr 25, 2004 06:57 PM)
This is in continuation to my last writeup on the racism that has amalgamated in to Zimbabwean cricket. The result of which is sheer disaster as Zimbabwe was folded today for 35, the lowest ever team total in ODI history. Today, in the 3rd ODI between Zim and SL in Zimbabwe, the Zimbabwean team ...Read more
Commented on own review
Apr 20, 2004 11:58 PM
True it was said that blacks were neglected but it was not the reality. The reality is that the whites in Zim really were the ones who started taking their cricket seriously and pushed the game in ZIM . I have nothing against the blacks but i really havent seen black players of african origin who ca...n be counted as very good except for Ntini, Tikolo, Olonga . There are 2 black players in the ZIM who are no better than average Indian Ranji players, Dion Ebrahim and STuart Matsikaneyiri. They have been giving a long rope for anybody's liking. Now we know the reason.Read More
Commented on thgons's review
Apr 20, 2004 11:50 PM
YEah and there are many who feel that Sachin is of no use to this team as he over the period of 3-4 years he has contributed very less towards India's wins. I really dont care what you find offensive. When you write profanities people may find it offensive. My article on the WALL did not have such. ...OK DUDe. neways ganguly has contributed more to this team not only as a batter but as a champion captain too.Read More
Commented on thgons's review
Apr 19, 2004 09:28 PM
do u have any attitude problems. seriously your review was good. I just wanted to add that we have 6 players who are match winners. The bowlers are juggled around. OOOPH. Yaar thik se pado to kya likha hai maine. Very predictable you are!. Maybe you are sore that i rated your review as Useful but th...ats exactly how i fell abt it. I could have revenge rated this review but i didnt because it deserved atleast a useful rating. Just to make you happy i am rating this review as Very Useful. Satisfied!Read More
Commented on thgons's review
Apr 17, 2004 07:58 PM
Tendulkar is not at all a match winner nowadays but he sure is consistent. But understand what i wrote before you pass comments. I never denied that Dravid is the one who is our wall and most of our wins would be built around him. But dont ever deny that it is just the innings of one man that made u...s the victors. Ganguly's 77,Laxman's 70 and Yuvi's 47 scored at a much much faster rate helped us to get that lead of 376 much faster. Ganguly atleast went for that run even after scoring 77 but did not get his hundred. Though he looked good enough for his maiden 200 too. But he still went for that run but due to his own carelessness he got out. thats LUCK FOR YOU MORON. If you think Dravid's run out did not lose us the 2nd match then Ganguly's run out was really insignificant. Ganguly is a great leader who has really made this team what it is now with John wright, leipus and other senior cricketers. Ganguly scored 77 coming out from a severe back spasm and it was his innings and laxman's innings that provided the impetus in the innings because though Dravid was excellent but still very slow while Ganguly and Laxman were brisk in their scoring rate. And when you say Ganguly has faltered i cant say anything else but just GO back to where you came from.Also Ganguly is a much much better player than Rahul dravid in one dayers and has played more match winnings than him so lets not get in to that. Happy writing ! PAL
the review was useful but i rated it as such because your title is incorrect. There is no such thing as the Big 3 in the indian batting lineup which has been replaced by the Big 6 : Sourav, Sachin, Rahul, Laxman, Sehwag and Yuvi. Kaif is a big name in ODI but will not find a place in this team unless one of the top 6 are injured. thats a pity but that is how it is.Read More
Commented on varun_sporty's review
Apr 14, 2004 10:23 PM
really dont know what you are talking abt. Ganguly is still in a good test form. As it is the article was out of context. India is on the verge of a historic win here. Dont know what will happen but u should be grateful to Sourav for coming back
Commented on optimistic_analysi's review
Apr 11, 2004 04:12 PM
Its quite Surprising that i missed this review of yours. But i must tell you why we lost. the name starts with a S and ends with a N and is sometimes credited as the Worlds best batsman. What a bluff. Sorry for the rating but this review deserved it.
Commented on own review
Apr 11, 2004 04:08 PM
The quandary of these ratings is that people who i guess are absolutely unaware of the situation are giving me low ratings without leaving comments. Anyways they must have their reasons, such as me favoring Sourav Ganguly. But i will keep penning down for sourav till i take my last breath........ An...d thats for sure.Read More
Commented on password's review
Apr 11, 2004 04:00 PM
Why do these bunch of losers even care to write a review. These mindless morons should be banned from this site. Ganguly is the greatest and do read my reviews.
Commented on GizmoFreak's review
Apr 11, 2004 03:58 PM
How come Sachin gets paid so much without actually playing in the important matches. Sourav has a bigger match winning percentage when he has scored runs. He comes good most of the time India needs him to be.
