Commented on vansika's review
Oct 20, 2007 08:03 PM
(Updated Oct 20, 2007 08:07 PM)
Dear vansika,
Ur so quick 150kmph iz same in SX4 also, do u hv ne knowledge of VTVT tech.? SX4 pick up iz nt gud as verna :-O SX4 iz cumin vth 16” alloys, tyres 205/60 n ur verna iz cumin vth 14” alloys 185/65, luk at d difrnc mam, car iz runin on tyres nt in air.
verna iz nt fstr thn sx4, ve...rna 0-100 @ 12.4 seconds, Sx4 @ 12.3 seconds [SX4 iz 50kgs heavier]
4 ur info, in a test drive, u cnt find out evrythn abt a car, demo cars r used by 100 + ppl, evn d labors use demo cars n dat 2 vry rashly.
SX4 huge ground clearnc [its jst 20mm] mks it unstable :-O. madam, dats y maruti iz providing 16” alloys, tyres 205/60, so dat de cn handle dis lil extra high ground clrnc.
Maruti Suzuki iz nt fool, de knw betr thn us, COG concepts n physics. Y u wanna tke a u turn at high speeds?? Cn u tel me d funda behind takin a u turn @ high speedz??in emergency, use hand brakes mam.
Wel abt Honda exterior looks, its old tdy, m nt at al intrstd in 4yrs old looks n 10yrs old engine,verna is ugly, bt 4 u, I cn undrstnd, d reason is, u r a GIRL, girls prefr santro ovr swift, whraz boyz prefer SWIFT[LION] ovr santro[CAT]. Ppl buyin verna jst coz its diesel engine, nt coz of its looks, evn accent iz betr thn verna.
Interiors-Honda iz betr thn SX4 n verna, small reason, de r takin xtra money. Bt 4 ur info, SX4 seats r much mor comfortable for 4 prsns thn city.
Suspensions-
verna front – MacPherson Strut with coil springs & anti roll bar, Rear – coupled torsion beam axle,
Honda city front – McPherson strut with stabilizer, Rear– H-type torsion beam suspension,
SX4 front – Independent suspension with GAS FILLED McPherson strut & anti-roll bar, Rear- Semi independent torsion beam vth GAS FILED SHOCK ABSORBERS, dats d reason, SX4 shockers r much betr thn verna n city.
Safety, offcrs SX4 d BEST..
Durability- city iz chargin xtra mam, jst coz of its gud quality stuff n abt technology, wats d use of dis technology [i-DSI SOHC 1497 cc @ 77 BHP]Read More
