Commented on own review
May 12, 2006 12:12 PM
Yeah, you are right when you say that MS is more interested in cross platform development. Lot of features in VS 2005 focus only on such measures.
About the Intel Complier, its not a complete compiler in itself, and has dependencies on MS VC++ 6 linker, which hinders its use as you must have VC++ 6... in order to get it working. Moreover, Intel hasnt optimized their compiler v9.0 to be compatible with Vc++ 8, and so , have greatly reduced it probability of expansionism in the compiler market against players like MS and Borland. again, there are a lot of Open_source alternatives that dominate, like DevC++ Compiler, which is probably the best C++ compiler IMO. VC++ is not entirely ASCII code, and hence its not pure C++.Read More
Commented on Mighty's review
Feb 23, 2006 01:01 PM
2 right bro, this ISP is pure CRAP---but they sort of have monopoly in gujarat.....sheesh....wait till i find a nice ISP....i'll kick their A**
Reviewed Branded Vs. Assembled Computers
Feb 20, 2006 09:43 AM
5971 Views
(Updated Feb 20, 2006 09:47 AM)
Well, assembled vs branded has been a war for years now, yet nobody is very clear about which is better. To this, there is a very simple answer- it depends.
First of all, I would like to differentiate between the 2- assembled is the one in which you buy the computer parts yourself(such as mot...Read more
Reviewed Microsoft Visual C++
Feb 09, 2006 11:52 PM
2900 Views
(Updated Feb 09, 2006 11:52 PM)
So we have another grand sequel to the widely accepted VC++. Actually, there is a great feature enhancement in this version, and if you are a real hotshot pogrammer, then this is a must for you. The best facility is that it has a wide range of data collection and processing, ie. it has got a lot...Read more
