Ektha's usual masala. Review on K Street Pali Hill

This story started as a simple story of three freinds living together with their families. as to usual ektaji stories the story draged on with the usual vamps, rape etc.

now what I dont undersatnd is why does ekta ji want to show and prove that one woman needs to get married many times and one man has many women in his live. it may be true in some or rare case but not every eher and evry house.

is marriage a joke for her? or doesnt she value any relationships in life? whats her problem?

now going back to simron, vansh died, now what the hell is she trying proove by smrithi's point. Smrithi wants now simron and Ronak to get together? isnt it sick changing or exchanging men in life like that? pls a woma's character in life hold a much biger position and respect and not nonsense like this. in ektha ji dramas she only wants to vulgerity of women where women or men change partners as clothes. it is not so ??????

pls stop showing nonsense like, it has a bad influence on the society and it degrades a woman's character.

pls those who read my review pls comment on it? do u agree or no?

thank u

sona