Budget camera fujifilm av100. Review on Fuji FinePix AV100

I purchase this camera near new year it cost me Rs 4200 comes with camera+ 4 gb memory card+ camera pouch+ camera thread+ 2 2100 miah rechargeable batteries + charger +manual+software cd +i think some cables

Well it is my first digital camera and iam very new to photography earlier I purchased the yaschika japanese film handy camera that always gave bad result may be when in my hand.for beginners like me its better choice to get digital camera .

As I know that technology is changing so I dont wanna spend more money on gizmos that I dont understand very much so I search net and market and find this camera and as I read very bad reviews about is hd recording performance yet when I seen it hd recording performance on you tube I like it

Now lets come to talks

As I only seen sample pics on fuji web I like it but as company always shows best of its product so I try to searh out whole internet to get its real sample shoots but I cant find one so I think I better write my review on it ....and show u the real sample pics taken by this camera

u can see its sample on my flickr account just search " canuragdelta" in member list and hit it .i also place url here:-https://flickr.com/photos/56475889@N05/

this photo I just shoot in auto mode without any setting and any serious work just click the camera like

a small child ......

as this photos both in night and day u can see the actual result ...........

as it comes with 2 year warranty that was not so bad

it gaves 100 pics range in 2 2100 miah batteries supplied with it in flash and non flash mix mode

may be gaves more pics

panaroma mode function is waste means u may seen depika padukone sony add but that only bulit better in sony

here in this model of fuji panaroma mode resolution cant be changed from default one that was less than 5 megapixel that makes this feature waste

in this function u take 3 snap and camera software connect three in series graphchandru021y

camera has digital image stablization that is inferior than optical one as found in nikon l22

color were not so vivid as nikon l22 but satisfactory

image is clear and sharp but grainy

face detection will work

and many other modes u get

now lets talk about hd recording that separate it from entry level camera

first as seen on internet I don't face camera crash or freezing while recording

it takes lot of storage for hd recording yet camera by default gaves 15 minute hd recording option automatchandru021y in 4 gb oem card supplied with it ...

voice recording and hd recording is satisfactory but not so good so u cheer up when u shoot out what a hd performance as I shoot out and review clip on my hd laptop it is slight grainy may be performance vary as I say I dont know perfect photography and lightening conditons

and last thing thats most imp although I took out all camera performnace review digitally

than I try to see its performance in hardcopy so I take a pics and get it hardcopy after print from photograph .photographer says result was not so bad without even know what camera I use when I tell about model and price he say thats will be satisfactory result although it cant

compete with its professional slr one

oh I forget to say it also provide optical zoom while video recording

but it has no viewfinder that leaves the enjoyment comes from that old typical camera in which we focus throgh viewfinder and then shoot u have to see in lcd in this camera

in my view it has satisfactory result .and technology is often changing so why we spent more because after 1 or 2 years what we purchase any camera now comes in half of current price or either outdated

or if u have passion for photography and have more money so better dont even see these handy cameras.better go for SLR that really gaves perfect result but also comes more than 25k