MouthShut.com Would Like to Send You Push Notifications. Notification may includes alerts, activities & updates.

OTP Verification

Enter 4-digit code
For Business
MouthShut Logo
Upload Photo
Fashion Image

MouthShut Score

78%
3.38 

Plot:

Performance:

Music:

Cinematography:

×

Upload your product photo

Supported file formats : jpg, png, and jpeg

Address



Contact Number

Cancel

I feel this review is:

Fake
Genuine

To justify genuineness of your review kindly attach purchase proof
No File Selected

Fashion Review
Nov 02, 2008 09:01 PM 1815 Views

Plot:

Performance:

Music:

Cinematography:

For those who do not like to read lengthy and elaborate reviews, I will finish off the review in short:


Fashion can briefly be described as a two and a half (and then some) hour long commercial for safe sex and


condoms, with only less than thirty seconds of foreplay, and Malaika Arora is nowhere around, though her husband is.


That’s it, we may all go home now, apart from the individuals who want long, elaborate and detailed reviews.


So, here we have a girl from Chandigarh wanting to become ‘a superstar’ (verbatim) who has come to Bombay. A girl who has that one content in the glamor industry who helps her out. Well, we all


have one, don’t we?


Anyway, the movie speaks about


Priyanka Chopra’s characters life and times as a struggler, a ‘showstopper’ and


then a failure and finally, the comeback kid.


Sounds good on paper, but the plot completely fails on screen. Why?


There are several, several reasons, here are some:


Priyanka Chopra: Years down the


line, people will pass snide remarks as to why actually Priyanka Chopra was


cast as an actress in such a strong role. The Aitraaz girl cannot carry such a


meaty role on her slender shoulders, and the problem is, her best is simply not


enough. Of course, there are several actresses that come to mind when one


thinks who could have been cast as the lead protagonist. I am not a great fan


of Aishwarya Rai, but she has the necessary oomph factor and can look down and


out when she needs to (watch Provoked).


The fundamental, basic, flaw: The


script. I mean, this is the twenty first century. And India has grown. Twenty


years ago, it’d be allright for Priyanka Chopra’s character to feel miffed at


Arbaaz Khan’s character telling her to abort the child as casually as telling


her to refill her drink (as I write this, an ad for a contraceptive pill is


going on the channel 9x, surely a fashion model has brains and money enough to


buy it).


But, I think eight out of ten


individuals, men and women, will agree with me that it would be foolish on


Sarin’s (Arbaaz Khan) part to actually tell Meghna (Priyanka) that ‘baby, screw


this multi million dollar contract with Vogue, forget that movie in the making,


or even that weeklong fashion bonanza in Bali, let’s divorce my trophy wife and


we can have the baby!’.   I may sound greedy and heartless and such, but


I am just practical. How many women we know today let children come in the way


of their professional advancement?


And of course, the dialogue of


the century lies with Kangana Ranaut’s character ‘I don’t understand’, when


Kitu Gidwani’s character sacks her as the front face of the modelling agency. I


mean, sweetheart, you have a coke trail longer than a conman’s chargesheet, you


being sober is in the news instead of you being drunk, and you ‘don’t


understand why’. Of course, one has to say that Kangana Ranaut and Madhur


Bhandarkar have got through the point that given all the weaknesses and idiosrychanises


that her character has, she sets the stage on fire with her performance.


Watch


the scene where she has a drag of wine and walks the ramp as if she owns it


(would it be too far fetched if I compare her acting with the ‘Joker’, because


while I was watching the movie, there were ‘oh no, what is she gonna do now’


sighs whenever she came on screen, like the one where she meets Meghna in the


washroom). This and this alone can keep a person in the media ticking for a


good five to ten years.


And lastly, the concepts in


Fashion fail to touch the everyday person. I mean, when people saw Page 3,


every part of them cried out in revolt against the happenings on screen and


wanted to do something about it. But what’s in this movie, a girl from a small


town comes into the big, bad world of fashion, wins because someone else loses,


acts in a lingerie ad to make money, promptly gets herself knocked up by a


married  man, goes on a destructive daze


and then tries to make amends. So, big deal.  Of course, she fails in one part and wins in


another. Basically, this girl is a sexy space shuttle destined for a journey to


success but the speed is ‘self destruct’.


Now, because I am a kind hearted


guy, I will give some scenarios that would fit better than the damp squibs that


the movie turned out to be:


Mrs. Sarin knows everything about


the affair between Meghna and Mr. Sarin, and actually asks for a threesome, and


that is the reason that she leaves them. Now, that would be interesting.


Also, the scene where Meghna


thanks the bald guy for his help is downplayed. Let’s see the scene like this,


Baldie comes and staggers off about how she has to do the rampwalk, and Meghna


just looks at him, and cries and finally goes towards him to hug him and say


thank you. Now that would be good, isn’t it?


But yes, one aspect that Madhur Bhandarkar succeeds in showing us is that inspite of all the heartbreak and angst behind the ramp, when the lights go off, all of are spellbound by the glitzy world of fashion.


Upload Photo

Upload Photos


Upload photo files with .jpg, .png and .gif extensions. Image size per photo cannot exceed 10 MB


Comment on this review

Read All Reviews

YOUR RATING ON

Fashion
1
2
3
4
5
X