Apr 10, 2013 04:47 PM
920 Views
The plot may be just a run-of-the-mill thing, you should probably seem similarities with recent or well
known flicks. As we all know that Finding a never told story for cinema is n-t that ease task. not a matter either. when perspective changes or the ability of maker to view things through different perspective is indeed a matter. whenever someone spell out the name-Lijo jose pallissery, that shot came to my head-in Nayakan, Indrajith sitting a black sofa, was a goose bums shot for me He had played with dark and light shades in NAYAKAN like no one did already, as long as cinema is a Art, and visuals are its Language, lijo leaves a terrific mark with his latest outing-
AAMEN!!
its frames sucks kuttannaadu beauty like never before, and he slowly weaves visual poetry on silver screen, shows how songs sequences blend as much perfectly as it could, Its frames gushes as magically as the music of clarinet , there is a scene Fahad unfolding that how was his father died,
I wonder when frames seemed to be an exquisitely classy portrait, there is a series of scenes which seemed to be ravishing- damn paintings. you just have to leave your seat and scream-when Solomon walks back from shoshanna's home-of course its a fabulous shot!! only the backdrops changed.
Here's a church and band set; story is same; its simply that bet-win game, but I admit that I got dumbstruck while watching the tremendous romance of solomon and shaoshanna Fahad oozes a glossy grooming act as solmon, the charm even in his eyes, while Indran delivered a very good performance, heroine and rachana beautifully had their parts. rest all did well what they supposed to be, especially kalabavan Mani rocked in his role. Except overdose off its assuaging Fart comedy. And that sleazy mother-son sequences- actually I did n-t get why lijo placed far t and that toilet craps in a classy row??
Does it make any sense??