MouthShut.com Would Like to Send You Push Notifications. Notification may includes alerts, activities & updates.

OTP Verification

Enter 4-digit code
For Business
MouthShut Logo
Upload Photo

MouthShut Score

53%
2.48 

Ease of Use:

Value for Money:

Effectiveness:

Sensitivity:

×

Upload your product photo

Supported file formats : jpg, png, and jpeg

Address



Contact Number

Cancel

I feel this review is:

Fake
Genuine

To justify genuineness of your review kindly attach purchase proof
No File Selected

''Veet'' sucks!
Feb 07, 2005 03:00 PM 13221 Views
(Updated Feb 07, 2005 03:04 PM)

Ease of Use:

Value for Money:

Effectiveness:

Sensitivity:

Let me make it very simple for all of you.


Veet sucks! Whats Veet? That hair-removal cream brand which is endorsed by Mrs.Salman Khan, I mean, Katrina Kaif. Now you remember?


This cream is similar to Anne French. Anyway, both of them are bad enough for the skin. A small squeezy pack of Veet costs around 60 bucks, and trust me, you will be able to use it one one time, unless you are applying it to a 2 cm sq. area only. My point is--The pack contains very little cream. It is just not worth 60 rupees! I'd rather go and get my hands and legs waxed safely from a beauty parlour by paying just a little bit more. Also, the spatula they provide doesn't make the application any easier.


Another reason why Veet is not worth it, is because, it doesn't completely remove the hair. So, the overall effect is not neat. My skin was left very reddish, with a piercing burning sensation, after using Veet. Friends, I suggest you go in for waxing, instead of using these chemical-loaded creams, the so-called ''hair removal'' creams.


Upload Photo

Upload Photos


Upload photo files with .jpg, .png and .gif extensions. Image size per photo cannot exceed 10 MB


Comment on this review

Read All Reviews

YOUR RATING ON

Veet
1
2
3
4
5
X