MouthShut.com Would Like to Send You Push Notifications. Notification may includes alerts, activities & updates.

OTP Verification

Enter 4-digit code
For Business
MouthShut Logo
Upload Photo

MouthShut Score

56%
2.72 

Leg Room:

Dealer Satisfaction:

Mileage:

Comfort:

Reliability:

Appeal:

Rs. 5,10,000 (Ex-Showroom)

Tata Motors

×

Upload your product photo

Supported file formats : jpg, png, and jpeg

Address



Contact Number

Cancel

I feel this review is:

Fake
Genuine

To justify genuineness of your review kindly attach purchase proof
No File Selected

Defective Indica: Another Conusmer case
Nov 05, 2004 04:27 PM 5081 Views
(Updated Nov 05, 2004 04:27 PM)

Leg Room:

Dealer Satisfaction:

Mileage:

Comfort:

Reliability:

Appeal:

Another real horror strory of buying INDICA & AFTER SALES SERVICE!


Before The Honorable Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum


Ernakulam.


O.P No


of 2001


Dr P C Sunil:


Petitioner


Vs.


1.Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd;


Passenger Car Division; 26th floor; World Trade Center;


Cuffe Parade;


Mumbai 400005.


2.Benz Motors;


Benz Towers;


Edapally, Ernakulam;


682024.


All the processes and notices to the petitioner may be sent to his


address shown above.


All the Processes and notices to the opposite parties may be sent to


the respective addresses shown above.


Petition filed under Section 12 of the consumer protection act.


Details of complaint: regarding


Deficiency of service


1] Service at 1209 km: As mentioned before, I approached the service


center on the fourth day after purchasing the car at the 225th km not


knowing that my visits would be numerous and without any result at the


end of the day. On the first visit I was told that all defects if any


would be attended to at the first service of the car after the running


in period. By the time the first service was due the problems had


compounded to include abnormal sound from the engine; dashboard;


drive- shaft and gearbox. The engine oil level had gone very low too,


the remedial action taken was replacement of the engine oil and


replacement of crucial valve shims which is usually carried out after


the vehicle has done 50000kms


2] Service at 2817kms: Previous complaints mentioned once again and


the remedial action taken was replenishment of one liter of oil for


which I was charged 99 rupees under the warranty period telling me


that 1 liter of oil is usually consumed in 1600kms which is much above


the prescribed limit once the running period is over. No action taken


for the previous complaints.


3] Service at 3485kms:Previous complaints mentioned along with a new


set of complaints and they were


1.Oil pressure warning lamp glowing at idle speed.


2.Fly wheel inspection cover missing.


3.Knocking sound from engine on acceleration.


4.Rattling sound while running at average speed.


5.Humming sound from AC compressor and engine timing belt.


6.Engine oil leakage.


7.Valve clearance noise


8 Vehicle stalling in 3rd gear.


9 Engine vibrating excessively when hot.


4] Service at 4597kms


1 All the unrectified complaints of the previous service mentioned and


2 Starter slipping on giving the ignition. No remedial action was


taken for any of the complaints.


5] Service at 5049kms


1Previous complaints along with a fresh complaint that the AC was not


working


This was the first instance that they attended the complaint of the AC


by replacing the AC relay.


6] Service at 5486 km: All the previous unrectified complaints


mentioned again.


Remedial steps were replenishment of the engine oil and change of


defective gearbox oil but these steps did not rectify the problems and


at the end of the day no fruitful rectifications were carried out.


7] Service at 7347kms: All the previous complaints along with a new


set of complaints


1.Severe unbearable rattling noise after starting the car from the


clutch assembly.


2.Steering vibration at certain speeds


3.Abnormal tire wear.


4.No 2 speed of AC blower not working


5.Horn not working


The only remedial steps taken were for the horn.


8] Service at 10310kms:Every one of the previous unrectified


complaints mentioned Totaling 12 in all.


Absolutely no remedial steps taken.


9] Service on 3rd Feb 2001: All complaints mentioned again but no


action was taken stating that all was perfectly normal.


10] Service at 11336 kms: All the complaints mentioned again and this


was the first time that they took serious note of my complaints. By


then I had lost my patience and had approached the head office of


Telco and had written to Ratan Tata. This time they attended to the


complaints on a war footing


11] Service at 14917kms:Every single one of the previous complaints


resurfaced along with a few new ones and they were 1. Glass winders


became tight.




  1. Fuel gauge faulty.




12] Service at 15394kms: By now I had got fed up of giving the same


complaints over and over again and had decided to approach the


consumer court for redressal of my predicament. The opposite parties


did not seem to be in the least bit interested in servicing the car as


they had got wind of the fact that I MIGHT approach the court.


13] Service at 16092kms:A major complaint of coolant leakage was


reported. The remedial step taken was the horrendous use of glue and a


paper cutting to stop the leak one of the most dangerous steps taken.


The end result was that the leak continued. This step alone shows the


haphazard way that work is done at the workshop. By now all the


patience I had; had reached the limit and I had decided by then to


definitely approach the court.


14] Service at 16680km: About 520km later I again approached them with


the same set of complaints along with a brand new one of the sound of


the body structure making a cracking noise due to improper welding at


the factory level .I also bought it to their notice that coolant was


leaking from the glued up area of the cars cooling system.


The remedial steps taken were;


1.The body was spot-welded thereby weakening the metal superstructure.


2.Valve clearance was found altered and hence they opened the engine


up once again and changed the metal shims


3.AC control panel being stuck with instant glue was replaced.


4 They once again used glue to arrest the coolant leak.


5.Lubrication was done of the window winder and was promised of a


replacement at the repeat of the complaint




  1. All other complaints were deemed to be frivolous and were not




attended too. I wish to mention here that the car was now becoming


unsafe to drive. On my trip to Salem the coolant leak started once


again courtesy of the paper cutting and glue forcing me to limp back


home in a thoroughly dangerous car having to stop every 100 km to fill


the water into the coolant reservoir.


15] Service at 18700kms: I made an emergency complaint at this service


as the coolant was leaking excessively from the same area which was


glued; about which I had complained thrice already. The right side


window had become extremely difficult to operate after their last


attempt at repairing it.


16] Service at 18862kms: Just 162 km later I again approached them


with the previous unrectified complaints along with a new horrendous


one of severe clutch slippage and loose weld joints.


Remedial step taken was the replacement of the clutch plate a second


time within 19000kms.


17] Service at 20440kms:At this service I told the service engineer


very clearly that I would be approaching the court if my complaints


were not rectified comprehensively. To refresh your honorable judges


memory


The remedial steps taken were half hearted to say the least even after


threatening to take them to court.


1.Gear Box oil was replaced which rectified the hard to engage reverse


gear.


2.Flywheel ring was replaced which rectified the starter slip problem.


3.Wheel cylinder assembly was replaced, for what I still cannot


fathom.


In the present circumstances the petitioner has no other option than


to approach the Honorable forum with a humble prayer for the following


reliefs.


Relief:


a] Direct the opposite parties to


reimburse Rs 329633.00 along with interest of


12% up to the date of final payment.


b] Grant a compensation of Rs 100000.00


for the mental agony and loss of practice and the inability to use the


car for its intended purpose.


c] Grant such other and further reliefs,


as the honorable forum deems fit and proper in the circumstances of


the case.


Upload Photo

Upload Photos


Upload photo files with .jpg, .png and .gif extensions. Image size per photo cannot exceed 10 MB


Comment on this review

Read All Reviews

YOUR RATING ON

Tata Indica - Diesel
1
2
3
4
5
X