Continuing on my quest to differ from the general opinion that mouthshut is the best thing that could have happened in your life,,,I present here some of the other arguments that I have come to think over. Here goes.
There has to be the same number of everything in similarity and differences so much so that it seems quite vague to argue about anything…. coz; u know that u r always only fifty percent correct while the other viewpoint seems to say the exact opposite fifty percent.
Why then should anyone influence the others viewpoint when one knows that in the end he is only 50% correct in whatever he says? That is, for the no. of people that agree with ur viewpoint, there r the same no. of people that do not…
Why then should a person speak? is it to draw the other to one’s viewpoint? should life be dictated? we donot need life to be dictated to us. Under the light of this mebbe it’s only that the truth leads us,,where we are destined to reach ..;,,we will do what we want to.…and hence the exception to the rule that everything can be contradicted.
Should it then be said, almost with 50% certainty that there is exactly fifty percent of the world that would always be left 50% undiscovered, which might upto 50 % accuracy be discovered in the near future?
This sentence then must reduce its truth to exactly (½ x ½ x ½) 1/8 and hence it is negligibly true or mostly false and same would be the opposite sentence.
So whatever we say..to the limit of 50% accuracy should be fifty perc false….to conclude to the very fact that started it all ..that nothing in this world can be certainly true and neither can anything be certainly false.
Or is it that the words ‘true’ and ‘false’ are our creations and that they may not relate to anything?
Whatever it may be…one thing is for sure…that we cannot say something that is exact…
If the above para does’nt make any sense to you ,then it must be understood by the law of averages that to somebody else,,it might as well make a tremendous impact or at least some impact.
Thinking further then…there would be people with no impact, some impact, great impact…so much so that the very idea of two opposite things itself is contradicted…because we have also created the intermediate.
If language is under our creation.then perhaps we conclude that if we had’nt created certain words,then no one would have followed them.but there has to be a greater force that had led us to create them.
Tell me then,,,does it remain unto you ,,, to act God,,, to interfere with fate,,,to say something which u know is only half correct????…..
But since people would come across this site because of something, because of some cause, the site becomes a part of the system and hence provides only an illusionary concept of truth. I don’t mean to say that opinions that are given are false,,,I mean to say that the opinions are only half the part of the truth,it is only the head,,,the tail would be different altogether.The conditions under which a review is written belongs only to u,,may not be true,,may not be false.
Consider that I write a review on a particular movie…(consider that I am going through the routine part of my life and am a bit depressed by the boring sequence of events that have become a part of my life overburdened with the pressure of the unknown turn of events and want to relieve some tension)..if I go see a psychological thriller at this time,,,I would end up writing a dull review ,,for the very reason that it caused a headache instead.
Consider an environmental shift,,a student of 15 ,enjoying life as it comes,,does’nt care about tomorrow or today,likes action and its his favourite hero starring,,,would’nt he like a change of such magnitude? Would’nt he love the movie? What would be his opinion then?
Contradiction in only two cases,,consider what would happen if we consider the opinions of the many people that r on mouthshut, the housewife(a gender of a difference), a 70 year old, people with different sun signs, people with different ascendants,hereditary influences,people with countless problems of their own,and others with none. They would’nt lead us anywhere.
How can the opinions match? How can the circumstances match? How can the differences match. How can the likes and dislikes match?
No, they won’t.
It’s a waste trying to infer from a change that effected ur life, since it would’nt have the same effect on mine.
Opinions don’t matter.
They really don’t.
What is good for you Phaedrus,
and what is not;
need we ask anyone for the answers?
