Jan 22, 2009 02:56 PM
3140 Views
(Updated Feb 13, 2009 12:25 PM)
My take on Dil Kabaddi(2008) decided to post a review here when I saw a measly 50% rating on MS that may turn-off some viewers from this rather goodmovie.
Dil Kabaddi is another "event" that fills the heart with joy. Just to see story-tellers(and not just star kids, diamond merchants, estate agents) get a chance to create real cinema in Bollywood is so heartening. We loved this movie and so did everyone in the half-empty PVR auditorium, median age 35, if the constant eruptions of gleeful laughter are any indication.
A primary reason for its success, of course, is the excellent performances. Cast against type, watching Rahul Bose as a bumbling professor or the suave Rahul Khanna as a mushy pup was a delight. Each character was well-etched, including the secondary characters of ex-boyfriend, office hunk(Rahul Khanna's cameo) and Chirag the lech neighbor. The consistency in their body language and motivations reveal a strong screenplay, with well-writtencharacters. Something so rare even in mainstream Bollywood cinema. That said, the "Kaaya" character could have been better etched.
The cream of the crop is, of course, Samit(Irrfan Khan) as the nouveau yuppie. The subtlety of his flawed yet acceptable English grammar and "over-the-top" dress sense was an excellent contrast to his earthy logic and basic decency. His pairing with an intellectual, stylish, smart Mita(Soha Ali, looking lovely)is not that surprising today- a lot of very happy couples around have the woman more successful, educated and well-traveled than the man.
Dil Kabaddi does not falter in the second half simply because thedirector had a STORY to tell. All the humor and all the "slice of life"shots culminated in a satisfying narrative. This is where the movietrulyscores.
Perhaps the movie targets a very specific audience, the mid-30s Indian. Those that grew up on Karan Johar's bubble-gum romance in the 90s and have been "happily" married for 4-7years now, like the characters in the movie. It documents their quest for love versus their'fantasy' of love. It is possible that this crowd will laugh the loudest, while those older and younger may find less to identify with in this story. They may yet discover it on DVD a few years later and laugh hearty. At its core, it is nothing more than a story about looking for truelove. Just that true love has different meanings for different people.
While some have panned the movie for its shameless copy of Husbands and Wives by Woody Allen, others have cringed at the barrage of sexual jokes and innuendo. The movie keeps you laughing almost the entire time and yet makes an honest observation about modern Indian marriages. As for the sex-jokes- they were much more tastefulthan what is dished out in family-comedy "U" rated movies every week.
It has been 16 years since Woody Allen's 1992 original. The fact that we finally identify with the type of marriages shown here is a telling comment on Indian society playing catch-up with the West. For better or for worse.
