May 12, 2008 03:59 PM
2845 Views
Please dont go on words, these people can get very ugly..I fought till last moment, and won, but very few people will go that way :
1) I had
subscribed to a broadband line from Bharti Airtel in the month of September 2008.
2) At the
time of subscription, I was promised that I would be able to change my scheme
any time I want, by calling Airtel customer care, and the appropriate changes
to underlying plan shall be made.
I was also promised that in case
of any grievance, I can follow a chain of ‘Subscriber Grievance Mechanism’
advised in your bill statement, and the issue will be resolved promptly.
3) The following is the deficiency in service from your
department:
a) My
request of change of plan for Dec 2007, did not result in removal of previous
plan’s billing criterion, resulting in abhorrent overbillingfor all the
days there after, up until my line was disconnected eventually.
b) Even
after reporting the problem numerous times and following it up with many
people, nobody from your department could fix the problem, and the bill
meter kept running as per previous scheme, although your new bills showed new
rental.
c) **Nobody came from your
department **– to rectify the problem - while it was happening, even after
many reminders from my end.
d) While all objectionable usage
log starting 4th Dec, show constant DSL usage for 24 hours in a day,
some even go to the extent of showing 144 Hours use in single day.
4) Following are the problems I am facing due to the above
deficiency:
a) Due to
non-removal of Static IP at your end, the plan change on 4th December resulted
in incorrect over billing of 24x7 broadband constant usages for next 35 days in
your system. The bill adds up to Rs. 27, 162(Twenty Seven Thousand One Hundred
Sixty Two).
b) Even after my complaints, the
billing continued till the line was physically disconnected till the last
day, and piled up further.
c) I am facing calls on regular
basis, to cough up the amount, even after the entire department has agreed that
the problem lies at their end.
5) Following are the details of my efforts to inform about
this grievance in the past to which there is no resolution:
a) Date : 3 Jan 08 Complain Number : 3016782 , based on over
billing enquiry.
b) Date : 8 Jan 08 Complain Number Followup from me : Mr
Kunwar
c) Date : 9 Jan 08 Complain Number Followup from me : Mr
Chandramani
d) Date : 11 Jan 08 Complain Number : 3152902 (Ms Pooja Gupta) Complain Number :
244713 (Ms Pooja Gupta) – Request To Disconnect
e) Date : 24 Jan 08 Complain Number : 3349740 (Mr Santosh , Mr
Ramashankar)
f) Date : 8 Mar 08 Complain Number : 4444898 (Ms Neha)–complaint
V
g) Mail to Nodal Office on March
8 Talked to Mr.Nikhil & Mr.Aditya
, who insisted I pay the bill.
h) Mail to Appellate Office on March 16