Knowledge is too vast a topic. Its' dimensions are not measurable and one can not finish in one lifetime.So remain selective, read authentic, proven, few and try to be master of that.Just having the information is not KNOWLEDGE, this can be claimed by only Honours or SME (Subject Matter Expert) or the real users or RESEARCH fellows. While most of us do only SEARCH and findings of the most are un-authenticated. So, the source of information (SoI) is the most critical thing. However there are many sources and the conflict within. But still I strongly feel the need of listing of authenticated data. Bombardment of information by various modes and in different form is wrong.Everybody has the right to choose his/her choice of subject and work.Better publish the list of inclusions & exclusions, do's & don'ts, checklists etc. ...
So that people, coming next to you, will realize instantly, in advance and will not waste the time, money & resources for the repeat activity.To remove ambiguity everywhere, quality-processes-standardization is a must. There should be systematic approach. I also see the scope for sight-insight-foresight, but insight is not full-proof for success.Positive-negative-realistic-neutral are 'state of the mind' in a given situation and anything could be wrong in different cases & scenario. Point is to apply your knowledge, information, experience, understanding, common sense to remove ignorance-lacking on the subject. One learns more by doing (following QPS) than just reading. Most of us are jack of all, master of none. Intelligent is one who takes lesser time-money and knows resource-management.Just tried to understand the root-cause and found that the periodical SWOT analysis can make people full-proof from lacking & ignorance.
