Hi Friends
You have already read my post"CONGRATULATIONS" whereinI have conveyed my congratulations to those who have been awarded STAR status by MS.com
I also recorded the track record of the star awardees. It is rather surprising to me that:
1. None of the STAR awardees could spare few seconds to read the post written for greeting them.
2. When they have not cared to read it is out of question that they would have cared to convey their "thanks" for their felicitation. Never Mind. Such things do happen .
3. None of the MSians tried to think as to why I took pains to mention the track records of the new STARs. Had somebody done it the it would have become clear that:
a) The STAR award does not depend upon the number of posts of any member.You may write thousands of posts but you can not be awarded STAR status merely on the strength of your number of posts..
b) The number of Mobile messages carry minimum weight in getting STAR status.
c) The number of RODs get priority over every post viz FD or FMM.
Now if the Number of RODs have the maximum weightage then :
(i) @ Cattie has 10 RODs against her 29 Reviews. She has 5 FDs against her 75 DPs.
(ii) @ xNJx has 11 RODs against his 90 Reviews. He has 6 FDs against his 115 posts
(iii) None of the above two has FMMs.
Now the question arises as to why the above two members were not awarded STAR status when they have more RODs and FDs against their name.
Every MSian including the senior and older ones know about @ xNJx and his writing capabilities.
The MSians also know how much disappointed and dRajeev_Vermarate was @cattie when her poems were not appreciated. She even went on to all extremes to vent her feelings. She vowed that she would not write any post till she got justice from MS support Staff.
I, therefore, request all MSians to express their views on this partiality of MS.Com in awarding theSTAR status.
The other two members stated by me viz @cattie and # xNJx must also be given STAR status.
WHAT DO YOU SAY, FRIENDS ?
