False Information VTP Verve,bad practices of VTP

Price On Request
Possession on: Dec 2024
Status: Ready to Move
VTP Verve - Sus - Pune Image
8% 1 6 Votes Claim this business
OTP Verification

Enter 4-digit code
False Information VTP Verve,bad practices of VTP
Oct 25, 2025 04:22 PM 173 views (via Mobile)
(Updated Oct 26, 2025 05:07 PM)

Customer Service:

Staff Courtesy:

Product Implementation Rate:

Im outraged and feel misled. Heres what happened:


I visited the VTP Baner sales office, looking to buy a flat in the VTP Sierra project. I was told it was sold out, and then the salesperson pushed me to pay for VTP Verve showing me a demo flat in a different project(VTP Monarque) and assuring me the Verve product would be the same.


On this basis I paid a token booking amount of 50k rs.


Within one day, due to my circumstances, I informed them I wanted to cancel. I was bluntly told the booking amount is non-refundable.


Whats worse: the official booking policy of VTP reportedly states 2 lacs as booking amount.sales person provided false information and made me paid at least 50k just to hold the propery .Is this how your policy works: ask less than policy, take money, then refuse refund?


Moreover, MahaRERA documents show that VTP Verves registration under the Reg. No. P52100031556 is seeking an extension of completion date to 31.12.2029, despite originally being scheduled for 30.06.2026.


In short: A so called reputed builder, has taken my hard-earned money and given nothing. I cancelled immediately(causing you zero loss) yet Im being refused refund. I expect better from your so-called customer-friendly brand.


I am publicly asking VTP Group to refund my 50 000 token amount. Silence or delay on your end will leave me no choice but to escalate via consumer forums, RERA complaint, and social media.


PLEASE DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY BY PAYING ANY OF THE VTP GROUP PROJECT.


#VTPVerve #VTPGroup #PuneRealEstate #HomebuyerRights #MahaRERA #DelayedProject #RefundNow


Please rate this review usefulnessRating Breakup

Very Useful (39%)

Useful (61%)

Not Useful (0%)

Comment on this review