War of the Worlds

This guy is Steven Spielberg! What did you expect?  

By: preetdacool | Mar 10, 2006 06:47 PM (Updated Mar 21, 2006 09:45 PM)

Plot:
Cast Performance:
Sound Track:
Cinematography:
Member's Rating:
Member's Recommendation: Yes

Read 523 times
Rated by 8 members

MouthShut Product Rating:

Recommended by
72% members

Pros:
Excellent plot, great visual effects
Cons:
A movie without a soul?


This is a really, really good movie. No, it’s not a literal depiction of the H.G. Wells novel, but they never said it was going to be. It’s sort of an ’’Inspired by’’ version.
The basic elements of Wells’ tale are here, placed into our time and world. To do that there have to be some changes.

This has both advantges and disadvantages. The latter include that we know already how the story has to end (although apparently some reviewers have never read the book, judging by their comments), but if you’re good enough, you can still create suspense and maintain interest throughout the whole picture. Spielberg and Cruise are good enough. To draw a parallel, in the TV show ’’Smallville’’, we Know he’s going to grow up to be Superman. We Know he’s not going to end up with Lana. We Knew the friendship with Luthor couldn’t last. Still, they made the journey itself interesting. Same thing here, in spades.

People have to understand this in order to review the movie fairly. Certain things about anyone doing the War of the Worlds just have to be there. Aliens; We’re losing; An everyman who doesn’t solve the situation, just survives it; TRIPODS! The 1953 version (which I enjoyed) didn’t have them because the FX technology of the time didn’t permit them to make them realistically. With what we can do now, any version that didn’t have them would be unacceptable; Germs. Accept it, folks. The Titanic sinks at the end. Like it or not, Custer dies. Bruce Wayne is Batman. No one recognizes it’s Superman behind Clark Kent’s glasses. In Wells’ story, we are saved by germs. Spielberg doesn’t get to change that and still call it War of the Worlds.

One clever thing that was done here was that everything was seen from the Earthlings’ point of view. There was no attempt to explain why the aliens came (’’They need our land/resources/women, etc. so they can relocate from their dying world/save their dying planet/breed and save their dying race, etc...’’). We have no idea why they’re here, and It Doesn’t Matter. They’re just here, slaughtering everyone in sight. Apparently they need the planet itself becuase they don’t just nuke Earth from space and they do start their version of terraforming. However, none of the characters in the movie know why this is happening, and again, It Doesn’t Matter. The movie says to us, ’’Give us that it’s happening, and we’ll play fair with you in the context of Wells’ basic plot’’. Some might argue that the ’’biological’’ ending wouldn’t really happen (our bacteria might not recognize the aliens as food), but that’s how Wells’ ended it and any other ending would be a cheat.

Tom Cruise gives a brauva performance. Despite whether you like or dislike him personally, the man can act. This movie wasn’t the only demonstration of that, just the best. He’s totally believable in his characterization, performance and evolution, and at the point where it appears he’s going to sacrifice himself, it’s completely credible. It’s not in there just to make the star look heroic, it makes total sense, given what’s happening and what he expects the immediate future to be. He never gives up. Not a ’’Die Hard’’ type of never-gives-up, just a that’s the way it has to be kind of never-gives-up.

Although I think it would have been more bittersweet and better at the end if Robbie hadn’t been found, I can accept it, especially since Ray’s relationship with his ex-wife doesn’t magically turn into bliss as would a typical Hollywood ending. No, we don’t find out what happens to the characters next. At the final scene, the movie is definitely over, as it should be. No tidy wrapping up. This is where the story we are being told ends.

After suffering through that total waste of time called ’’Signs’’, all I can say is that someone should tie M. Night Shyamalan to a chair and show him this film until he understands that THIS is how you make an invasion from space movie.

If you make a film with the same kind of direction, same special effects, same actors, same quality of acting but with a different story-line, I would have given a three star rating or four to the most, but WAR OF THE WORLDS deserves full five because of its out-standing plot.


Plot Revealed In The Review: Somewhat revealed
Best to watch with: No Comment
Movie Genre: No Comment
Best part in the movie: No Comment

How useful was this review? (Earn 3 MS-Points™ by rating reviews)









Brand Owners & Brand Managers
click here to respond to this review





Name: Preet


Reviews: 58
Diary Posts: 0
Trusted by: 16 members
Trust this member
Distrust this member
Email this member
Send a Gift
Alert on new review by this member


Rate this review

(Earn 3 MS-Points™ by rating reviews)

More Reviews





Share this review


Click the button below to bookmark this review.

Bookmark and Share





Your customers are talking.
MouthShut.com can help you listen to them.





Email this review Print this review
Most emailed review Alert on more reviews on this product
Bookmark this review  



Icons Help
More than 836 members have won various MouthShut.com contests.

Review of the Day

Review of the Day

MouthShut In The News

MouthShut In The News

Community Center

Community Center

CEO Newsletter

CEO Newsletter


Compare features and prices and read consumer written reviews on millions of products and services.
© 2000-2008 MouthShut.com, Inc