Apr 03, 2017 12:49 PM
3712 Views
What a bore! Rabindranath Thakur might have been a great poet and philosopher, but he seems to have known little about the art of conveying the ideas succinctly so that they can reach their target audience.
Nationalism is another sick form of vile separation that keeps the humane away from one another. While writing about such a critical concept shouldn't he consider the vast majority of laymen that might benefit by reading and contemplating on such topics?!
Agreed, these were lectures delivered by him for an elite audience at the West and the East, but I doubt that even those'elite audience' would have kept rapt attention on hjis words. Once you cross some 20 lines you lose track of what you're reading about.I couldn't read it more than two pages at a time. Too wordy and tiresome.
Wish Thakur had known that no idea, however great it might be, would be driven home clearly, when presented using words that are too poetic and too abstract for attention!
