|
|
Quality of Journalism:
|
 
|
Quality of Features:
|
|
|
Quality of Ads:
|
|
Value for Money:
|
|
|
|
The verdict regerding Cauvery dispute has really benifited Tamil Nadu.In earlier solutions also Tamil Nadu got more share of water ,but the crecent verdict gave i think
one sided upper hand to Tamils.
Karnatak has more draught area,the major portion of Cauvery flows through ,as less underground water,even has to give water to dam less Kerala.What i feel is it had been better if Karnatak would have got as per earlier settlement portion.
I think Tamil Nadu government should show bit generosity in the name of being Indian or making the part of south forgetting statehood.This need political approach towards the dispute.This thing unnecessarily will increase the tension along border areas.When the verdict was out,there was curfew in banglore and some border part of karnatak.
Even i feel centrc also should interfere in this dispute.In earlier times former prime minister Vajpayee had shown the interest and matter was somewhat solved.
|
Pros: |
nothing
|
Cons: |
injustice to Karnatak
|
How useful was this review?
(Rate Review - Earn 5 MS-Points™)
|
How often is this magazine printed:
No Comment
|
Are you a subscriber:
No Comment
|
If a subscriber, will you renew your subscription?
No Comment
|
If not a subscriber, how often do you buy this magazine:
No Comment
|
|
More Reviews On This Item
|
Review Rating (Rate Review - Earn 5 MS-Points™)
More Reviews
|