I am not sure from where to begin with ,so let's start from what the home minister of maharastra said." we will give reply of bullet by bullets".
thank you sir ,for this kind information."Rahul raj" yes the boy who was killed in a heroic encounter by mumbai police ,deserved it .that's what i can say from the body language of the officer in control of that operation.
So the story begins from the begining ,MNS's so called "BHOOMIPUTRA ANDOLEN" took the dirty turn when several students were thrown out of the city,and the home minister who is saying we will reply of bullet by bullets was sleeping.
you can imagin the mindset of a 22 -25 year old student of bihar,so rahul raj thought of taking revenge in filmy style ,hijaked a bus a asked to police that i want to talk to mr. raj thakre ,as he was not a proffesational he couldnt handle the situation and fired in haste and tried to overcome his fear by firing.
youngster are so much influenced by bollywood ,this case shows that ,he tried to repeat a "rang de basanti" but as it is it's real life man not a movie where you can do what you want to, he might forgotten the final result of the movie .that how all 4 were brutally murderd by the commandos ,that costed him as that was the same thing,which was going to happen with him as well.
I am not trying to defend or justify any character here ,but what hurted me most that 3 firing vs 13 round of firing ,ok he was wrong (which i agree) but shouldnt police have tried to arrest him rather than shooting him down,police couldnt have shooten him on his legs ,arms anywhere and tried to arrest him?
HE WAS NOT A TERRORIST BY ANY MEANS.i cant resist myself by giving anither example of movie "a wednesday" when naseer tells anupam that now when you know i am not a terrorist i am a cooman man your voice seems confident"
ya that's the case a comman man is just a machine who has no right to behave uncommanly and if he does then he will be surly punished,but the same rule never applies on special cases (raj thakre included).
ok befor i lost my plot again ,let's annalyse what was his fault?
was he a guilty of hijaking a bus ? NO , cant be because in such cases police and system always surrender(remember the kandhar)
so was he guilty of breaking a law? are you kidding breaking a law in mumbai is not a crime(see mns,shivsena and many more political and regillious goons)
ok let me guess,he was a guilty of thratening the police and firing? are you serious who the police is in mumbai?(raj openly challenges a senior police office to come without uniform)

ok i give up ,so tell me for what he was guilty?
the answer is he was gulity of the biggest crime in modern senerio a man can do and that is to listen to your heart and try to do what it says.
he was just a emotional fool who thought that i can do this ,its so simple just hijack a bus and the cops will surrender due to pressure and he will fullfill what he want ,but 1 thing he forgot that in the land of fims there is no filmy thing can happen.
i am not sad for him but i am angry why he did this ? was he living in his own imaginary world ? may be ,so thank god he is now out of there.
and this incident will be forgotten by all of us as previous ones but it give us a lesson of our lifetime.
DONT LISTEN TO YOUR HEART IT CAN COST YOU YOUR LIFE.